Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!
Post Info TOPIC: The Malaysian Connection; Cham People
HISTV

Date:
The Malaysian Connection; Cham People
Permalink   
 


The Malaysian Connection; Cham People 

 

The Fall of Two Cities

April 1975, two capital cities, little over 200 kilometres apart fell to different communist armies within weeks of each other. In the chaos that preceded in both, hundreds of thousands had already fled from both Cambodia and Vietnam.

Between 1975 and 1982, it is believed that more than a million people left the two countries as refugees, often packed into small, unseaworthy boats.  Many managed to reach neighbouring countries such as Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Philippines, with countless of those less fortunate perishing at sea.

Destinations

Malaysia was just one destination for these ‘Indochinese’ refugees. However, like many countries in the region, the Malaysian government were not willing to accept them. The refugees were placed in camps before  processing and resettlement in a third country under the policy of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR).

In Malaysia, it was estimated that more than 250,000 Indochinese refugees made their way through numerous transit points in the country before being resettled elsewhere. Due to fears including those of racial imbalance and security, especially over ethnic Chinese, the Malaysian government of the time refused to let the refugees settle in the country. However, a notable exception was made for 9,704 Muslims or practitioners of the Islamic faith, ethnically known as Chams or Islam Kemboja (Islamic Khmer).

The Refugee Crisis

Malaysia had been a staunch ally of the Saigon regime in Vietnam and the governments of Sihanouk in Cambodia, and later Lon Nol, following the coup of 1970. The nation had fought a long battle with a communist insurgency, known as ‘The Emergency’, which officially ran from 1948-1960, but was still simmering in the mid 1970’s, with bombings and political assassinations still commonplace.

When the first of the Indochinese refugees began landing on the shores of the Malay peninsula in April 1975, they were treated with sympathy. However, as their numbers swelled and showed no sign of slowing, public opinion began to shift, and the immigrants were seen as a possible threat to national security. In 1977 the refugees were reclassified as illegal immigrants under the Immigration Act, and banned from leaving detention camps.

A picture taken in the late 1970s shows a group refugees (162 persons) arrived on a small boat which sank a few meters from the shore in Malaysia.

Bidong Island became the primary refugee camp in Malaysia when it was opened in August 1978. With a land mass of just 260 hectares, Bidong was designed for 4,500 refugees, but by June 1979 Bidong had a population of over 40,000.

Bidong Island camp, 1979 (UN)

As thousands of mainly southern Vietnamese continued to leave their home country illegally, both the Malaysian and Indonesian governments were criticized by international groups for towing boats back out to sea and pushing them into the other’s waters.

As this very public humanitarian crisis was unfolding, a lesser known group of refugees were quietly arriving in Malaysia, mostly from Cambodia, and mostly Muslim.

This group were known as Muslim Cambodians (Kemboja) or Malay Cambodians (Melayu Kemboja), later becoming referred to as Melayu Champa or Cham Malays.

Unlike the majority of Vietnamese refugees who arrived by boat, the Chams mainly came to Malaysia overland in two distinct groups.

The first originated from among the Cham communities in Vietnam but had travelled to Cambodia before leaving again towards Thailand. Many Chams from the coastal areas in places like Saigon, Phan Rang and Nha Trang moved to border towns such as Chau Doc and Tay Ninh before crossing over to Cambodia as the war in Vietnam intensified. From Thailand they headed south and crossed the border into Malaysia.

The second group came from Cambodia. Known as Cambodian Chams, they consisted of generations who had steadily migrated from Vietnam to areas such as Kampong Cham and areas north of Phnom Penh since the decline of Champa in 1471.

Meanwhile, the Malaysian government faced pressures from welfare organizations such as PERKIM (Pertubuhan Kebajikan Islam Malaysia/Muslim Welfare Organisation of Malaysia) and other political parties to assist the Cham Muslim refugees. The Organisation of Islamic Countries (OIC) also put pressure on Malaysia in the name of Islamic solidarity

Both humanitarianism and a shared religious bond were brought forward as a case for temporary resettlement in what was the closest Islamic majority nation to the new communist regimes.

As early as June 1975, only months after the fall of Phnom Penh, Malaysian embassy officials in Bangkok were working with Thai authorities and UNHCR. They began visiting refugee camps and identifying Chams among the displaced peoples, in order to process applications to relocate them.

Many took up the offer and towards the end of 1975, 1,279 Cham refugees were accepted into Malaysia. The process continued well into the late 1980s, resulting in a total of 9,704.

The history of Cham settlement in Malaysia, especially the state of Kelantan, predates the communist wars by 500 years. As, what was then, Kingdom of Dai-Viet began pushing further south, the old kingdom of Champa fell. 

 



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:
Permalink   
 

Champa And Malaysia- Connections Part 2

 

 

Champa

Many of the Chams who resettled after fleeing Cambodia and Vietnam were distantly related to people in the Malay Peninsula, particularly in Kelantan state in the north east.

As a centre of learning following the spread of Islam in the area, which began around the 10th century, the Malay Peninsula became a refuge for Chams following the decline and fall of the Champa kingdom, which finally ended in 1834.

The Champa kingdom once stretched from the mountains of southern Laos along the Gulf of Tonkin towards the Mekong Delta. The people had came from the south east, most likely sailing from Borneo and Malaya during the late stone age, and were well established society by the year 200 CE.  A contemporary of the pre-Angkorian kingdom of Funan, there was a still a strong connection with the sea, and with trading with both Indian and Chinese seamen was evident from at least the 4th century.

Intermittent wars between the Khmer empire and the loosely aligned Cham statelets reached their climax in 1177, when a surprise attack by a Cham naval force ransacked the city of Angkor.

Cham warriors in a boat, depicted on the Bayon

Retribution came quickly, and soon Champa was beaten back and forced into an existence as a vassal state, while the Khmer empire reached its peak under Jayavarman VII.

By this time Islam had taken root and began to split the once dominant Hindu belief system, at around a similar time when Buddhism was taking hold in the court of Angkor.

A reasonable theory is that the ideas spread from eastern traders via Arabia and India since the 9th century may have appealed to those who believed massive military defeats and loss of lands meant the old gods had abandoned them. This religious divide may have made the Chma states weaker, and would prove to have lasting consequences in the final days of the kingdom. Similar theories have also been made relating to the switch of state religion in Cambodia being a factor in the decline of Angkor.

Many of the ethnic Chams living in Vietnam today still speak Cham (a Malayo-Polynesian language) and keep old Hindu traditions, while the majority of Cambodian Chams are Muslim and often learn the Arab Melayu script in religious schools.

Champa (green) c1100

The Decline of a Kingdom

To the north, in 938, the Dai-Viet kingdom had finally beaten 1000 years of subjugation under the Chinese and began a campaign of southern expansion. Centuries of warfare between the kingdoms culminated in a total defeat in 1471 with the sacking of the Champa main city-state of Vijaya along with the slaughter of around 60,000 of its inhabitants, with many more enslaved.

Cham society was matrilineal, and inheritance passed through the mother. Because of this, in 1499 the Vietnamese enacted a law banning marriage between Cham women and Vietnamese men, regardless of class. The Vietnamese also issued instructions in the capital to kill all Chams within the vicinity. More attacks by the Vietnamese continued and in 1693 the conquered Champa Kingdom’s territory was integrated into Vietnam.

As would happen in later centuries, many fled westward, settling in eastern Cambodia, while others crossed the Gulf of Thailand to what is now modern Malaysia and Indonesia.

A small ‘rump’ state continued to exist sandwiched between the Mekong Delta (still Cambodian controlled) and the land hungry Viet kingdom in north. This ‘Udong’ land was gradually worn down by Vietnamese encroachments. By 1832 that last part of an independent Champa was finally annexed by the Vietnamese under Emperor Minh Mach.

 There were major exoduses of Cham people recorded in 1692, 1796 and 1830 – 1835 as the Vietnamese continued to push down south, with most joining their fellow exiles in Cambodia.

Resistance to Vietnamese rule continued, with several revolts in the 17th, 18th and 19th, often with assistance from rulers in Kelantan and Malacca. For example, a revolt in 1796 against Vietnamese control was led by a Malay nobleman named Tuan Phaow, who is believed to have been from Kelantan as he told his Cham followers that he was from Mecca (which is the Cham name for Kelantan).

In 1833, the Chams began a guerilla campaign, led by an Islamic clergyman from Cambodia named Katip (Khatib) Sumat who had spent many years studying Islam in Kelantan. 

Cham-Vietnamese historian Po Dharma believes that personal troops of Sultan Muhamad I of Kelantan (1800– 37) sent to join the uprising, who helped raise an army to accompany Katip Sumat to Champa.

Although nominally fighting to free Champa, he used the bond of Islam to gather both Malay and Cham support and called for jihad to rally the cause from outside the country. This notion of a holy war appears to have split the Cham along religious lines, with Hindu Chams siding with the occupying armies against their kin during the uprising.

The defeat of Katip Sumat and other Malay-Cham resistance against the Vietnamese in 1834 marked the end of Champa as an entity, but Malay-Cham relations continued.

Following the uprising, the Vietnamese began a systematic oppression of Cham people, which on came to an end in the 1860’s with French colonization of Cochinchine.

The Missionaries

Islamic missionaries from Kelantan had been visiting the displaced people in both Cambodia and Vietnam since at least the 16th century. A scholar named Ungku Omar was recorded as visiting the communities in Cambodia during the 1580’s and 1590’s. At this time there were also sizeable ethnic populations of Malays based in the post-Angkor kingdom, so it would be easy to suppose an amount of interaction between the closely related groups taking place, including intermarriage.

Although the names of countless preachers and missionaries have been forgotten over time, their place of origin, namely Kelantan and the Malay Peninsula, was certainly remembered by generations of Chams. It was reported that, when Malaya broke away from the British Empire in 1957, the act was celebrated among the Cambodian Chams as “Kelantan is now independent!”

Many Chams sent their children to Kelantan for religious education, with Pattani in Thailand also being a popular destination.

Husin bin Yunus, a native of Kampong Cham, was sent by his parents to study religious teachings at Kampung Pulai Chondong, Kota Bahru, Kelantan in 1957. He continued his studies and returned to Cambodia in 1964 and became a religious teacher.

By 1971, life was becoming increasingly unbearable in Cambodia,so decided go back to Kelantan with his family. Husin bin Yunus’ research on the historical links between Kelantan and the Cham people provided a list of several Muslim missionaries, both male and female, going back to Ungku Omar in the late 16th century. At least three female missionaries returned to Cambodia in 1975, their fate is unknown.

Male missionaries named 1580-1932Female missionaries named source: Abdullah bin Mohamed (Nakula), “ Keturunan Melayu di Kemboja dan Vietnam”

Language Links

Today in Kelatan there are still linguistic hints of a shared history. Place names in Kelatan such as Pengkalan Chepa (Base of the Chams) and Kampung Chepa (Village of the Chams), along with fabric and materials, sutra Chepa (Cham silk), kain Chepa (Cham cloth), padi Chepa (Cham rice) among others.

Local legend says Kampung Laut Mosque, one of the oldest in the country with the current structure dating back to the 18th century, was originally built by Cham sailors on the site in the 15th century.

Sadly, the same cannot be said for the place that was Champa. Years of ‘Vietnamization’ following the conquest of the kingdom all but obliterated original place names. Historical sites such as Mỹ Sơn, a Hindu temple complex which once would have rivaled Angkor, were heavily bombed during the Vietnam War.

Chams Today

The majority of the modern day Cham population resides in Cambodia, even after suffering horrendous loss of life under the Khmer Rouge regime, where it is estimated to be around 300,000. Numbers for Vietnam are disputed, but probably around 200,000.

In Malaysia, most of the pre-refugee Chams have long been assimilated into the wider Malay community through marriage. One estimate puts the number of ‘Khmer-Islam’ descendants of the almost 10,000 refugees granted asylum in the 1980’s has grown to around 50,000.

However, in Malaysia there are also undocumented communities, of those who have entered unofficially, or overstayed following visits to family. This group lives on the fringes of Malaysian society, often in abject poverty. This was highlighted in Pekan in February 2019 when the body of Siti Masitah was discovered, Born to undocumented parents who moved from Kampong Cham in the 1990’s, she had a Malaysian birth certificate, but was listed as a non-national. Cambodian Mohd Amirul Abdullah, 23, was later charged with her murder, and questions were raised in the country about the sizable, but insular community.



-- Edited by HSTV on Thursday 13th of February 2025 07:14:41 AM

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.